江苏南京市中级人民法院近日公布一起年度典型案件:一家负责处理污水的公司,偷排污水并将其通过暗管排入长江,并人为篡改监测数据。被告单位南京胜科水务有限公司领到国内污染环境“最严厉罚单”,被判处罚款加环境修复费共计亿元,相关责任人员最高获刑6年。(1月9日《南方都市报》)

Jiangsu's nanjing intermediate people's court recently released a typical annual case: a company responsible for treating sewage, stealing sewage and draining it into the yangtze river through a hidden pipe, and artificially tampering with monitoring data. The defendant's unit, Nanjing Shengke Water Co., Ltd., received the \"most severe penalty\" for environmental pollution in China, and was sentenced to a fine plus a total of 100 million yuan for environmental restoration, and the relevant responsible personnel were sentenced to a maximum of six years. (Southern Metropolis Daily,9 January)

  污水处理公司本来是治污企业,然而南京这家企业却是污染制造者。当“治污”变成“制污”,无疑对环境破坏极大,因为污水处理企业集中了大量污染物,一旦偷排污水必将造成严重污染。所以,污水处理企业都被列为重点监管对象,南京这家企业却能向长江偷排污水并篡改监测数据,实在令人震惊。

The sewage treatment company was originally a pollution control enterprise, but the Nanjing enterprise was a pollution producer. When \"pollution control\" becomes \"pollution control \", it is undoubtedly very harmful to the environment, because sewage treatment enterprises have concentrated a large number of pollutants, once the sewage is stolen, it will cause serious pollution. Therefore, the sewage treatment enterprises are listed as the key regulatory targets, Nanjing this enterprise can steal sewage to the Yangtze River and tamper with the monitoring data, it is shocking.

  这说明两个问题:一方面,说明该企业利欲熏心,毫无商业伦理。按说,污水处理企业应该规规矩矩赚取污水处理费,但该企业却偷排污水,即把要处理的污水偷排掉,不用花多少成本,就把污水处理费装进了口袋。可见,这家企业的主要责任人“心太黑”,没有一点儿职业道德、商业道德可言。

This illustrates two issues: on the one hand, the enterprise's interests, no business ethics. It is said that the sewage treatment enterprise should behave to earn sewage treatment fees, but the enterprise stole the sewage, that is, to dispose of the sewage to be treated, without much cost, the sewage treatment fees into the pocket. It can be seen that the main responsible person of the enterprise \"too dark heart \", there is no professional ethics, business ethics can be said.

  另一方面,监管者对重点监管对象仍然不够严。虽然2013年到2017年,该企业因环保问题屡次被罚,即使每次处罚都是依规进行,但坦率地说没有“罚疼”。如果每次都从严从重处罚,或许会是另一种结果。更重要的是,2014年至2017年期间,处罚归处罚,该企业仍在偷排污水,可见监管有漏洞。

Regulators, on the other hand, remain lax about key regulators. While the company was repeatedly penalised for environmental issues from 2013 to 2017, even if each time the penalty was carried out in accordance with the rules, frankly there was no \"penalty pain.\" If the punishment is severe each time, it may be another result. More importantly, between 2014 and 2017, penalties were imposed and the business was still stealing sewage, showing loopholes in regulation.

  监管漏洞之一是没有发现污水通过暗管排入长江,漏洞之二是没有发现监测数据被篡改。所以,当地监管者也应该从这个案例中记取教训,完善监管措施。不过,即便过去监管有漏洞,该企业也没有那么幸运,最终要为自己的违法行为付出沉重代价,相关人员被判刑,企业要为此承担巨额罚款。

One of the regulatory holes was that no sewage was found draining into the Yangtze River through a hidden pipe, and the second was that no monitoring data was found to have been tampered with. Therefore, local regulators should also learn from this case and improve regulatory measures. However, even with past regulatory loopholes, the company is not so lucky to end up paying a heavy price for its own transgressions, for which officials are sentenced and companies pay a hefty fine.

  尤其是亿元罚单,应该说超出了该企业违法节省的成本,即使不会使其“倾家荡产”,也会让其“刻骨铭心”。而之所以会有这样的罚单,既是因为我国《环保法》《水污染防治法》都是“史上最严”,也是因为司法机关打出“组合拳”,在判处罚金的同时,还让该企业赔偿亿元环境修复费用。

In particular, the billion yuan ticket, should be said to exceed the cost of the enterprise's illegal savings, even if it will not make its \"ruined property \", but also let its\" unforgettable.\" And the reason why there will be such a penalty, not only because our country's \"Environmental Protection Law \",\" Water Pollution Prevention Law\" is \"the most strict in history \", but also because the judicial organs play\" combination fist \", while imposing a fine, but also let the enterprise compensate 100 million yuan for environmental restoration costs.

  “谁污染谁修复”,污染企业理应为自己行为造成的环境损伤承担修复责任。应该说,亿元“最严厉罚单”,除了对南京这家企业教训深刻之外,同样也对其他污水处理等企业敲响了警钟。对污水处理企业而言,“治污”变“制污”只能暂时获取小利,最终必将被发现,必将付出更大违法代价。希望所有企业从“最严厉罚单”中记取教训,不要心存侥幸,否则将会面临类似的罚单。

“Who pollutes who repairs ", polluters are responsible for repairing environmental damage caused by their actions. It should be said that 100 million yuan "the most severe penalty ", in addition to the Nanjing this enterprise lessons, but also to other sewage treatment and other enterprises sounded the alarm. For sewage treatment enterprises," pollution control "to" pollution control "can only temporarily gain small profits, will eventually be found, will pay a greater illegal price. It is hoped that all companies will learn from the "toughest penalties" and not take chances or face similar penalties.

  另外,监管者也应要从这个案例中记取教训。如果能采取更有效的措施防范企业偷排污水、篡改监测数据,或许企业就没有机会违法了。如果每次处罚违规企业时,调查能深入一些,处罚能严厉一些,企业也不敢违法了。如果监管者查处该企业其他问题时,能扩大调查面,或许偷排污水早被发现了。

Regulators should also learn from the case. If more effective measures were taken to prevent companies from stealing sewage and tampering with monitoring data, perhaps they would have no chance of breaking the law. If every time the punishment of illegal enterprises, the investigation can go deeper, the punishment can be more severe, the enterprise also dare not break the law. If regulators investigate other problems with the company, they can widen the investigation, and perhaps steal sewage.


欢迎转载,转载请注明出处:赌真钱的app